Your Dollars at Work?

Written on November 24, 2007 – 8:56 am | by Chris Schaffer |

Lost in the vociferous debate being waged between congressional democrats and the White House over proposed funding increases to the SCHIP program, a children’s health insurance initiative, was the near-unanimous passage of the Department of Defense budget. The bloated, $471 billion spending measure passed with overwhelming bi-partisan support, sliding through the House of Representatives and Senate with nary a voice raised in opposition.

The new defense budget is a near $80 billion increase over last year’s spending measure. It covers things like buying new ships for the navy, pay raises for military personnel, and increasing the rolls of the Army and the Marines. It does not cover the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the funding for which is contained in a separate, “emergency” spending measure.

These two spending proposals illustrate where the American Government’s priorities lie better than a thousand policy speeches ever could. Just to break it down; congress decides that our country, which already spends a higher percentage of its GDP on defense than any developed nation in the world, needs an $80 billion bump, and no one bats an eye. Yet when someone raises the idea that we ought to be ensuring that poor children can afford to buy medicine and receive the medical care they need, a huge political fight ensues.

Is this what we have become as a nation? Do the American people really value Destroyer-class warships and advanced weaponry over caring for our children? Have we become so callous that we elect to devote more of our resources to stockpiling the tools of destruction over taking care of the most vulnerable members of our society? Do we place the ability to kill over the ability to save lives?

We may be beyond redemption if the answers to these questions are yes. Fortunately, these spending measures do not represent the true will of the American people. Instead, they represent the disconnect between Washington policies and American values. Ask most average people whether we ought to be focusing more on education, health and social welfare, or on stuffing the pockets of defense contractors, and nine out of ten would want us to invest in our people.

The problem is that most people are unaware of our wasteful, reckless policy of ever-expanding defense spending. The reason they are unaware is that it has become uncontroversial in Washington; not only are most elected representatives scared to death of voting against funding for the military, they’re afraid of even discussing it. Anyone who speaks out against buying new billion dollar submarines is suddenly soft on national security, and therefore must want the terrorists to win.

This culture of fear must be reigned in. As we pump an ever-more irresponsible amount of our tax dollars into defense, our social programs, health system, and national infrastructure are deteriorating to dangerous levels. We are witnessing a decline in the essential services provided by our government at a time when tax receipts are at a record high. This neglect must be brought to an end, or we will put our entire society at risk.

A responsible government will invest in the health and education of its citizens. Washington must re-direct their priorities to get in line with what is best for the American people, before it’s too late. Otherwise, we risk becoming a modern-day Sparta, or worse, Soviet Union; pouring our resources into our military at the expense of our citizens’ daily lives.

  1. 3 Responses to “Your Dollars at Work?”

  2. By Havvy on Nov 24, 2007 | Reply

    Hey, nice blog. I’ve read every entry so far.

    To those who are ’scared’ of being soft on national security, flip the accusations back at those who call you ’soft’ as being the ones who ignite the fear and are causing public danger by putting more funds into national security that isn’t needed.

  3. By Van Campbell on Nov 29, 2007 | Reply

    It is indeed incredible how much we waste on the war machine. It’s actually painful to think of what better good these funds could have supported.

  4. By Chris Schaffer on Dec 1, 2007 | Reply

    Hey Havvy, Thanks for you interest in Sustainable Democracy. Hopefully we can keep you as a loyal reader!

    Your strategy on flipping the argument is certainly a valid one. However, until some things begin to change I’m not sure how effective some of it is at the moment.

    Van - Yes, the good work that could be done with the same money could take our nation from lagging steadily behind the Euro to being a real competitor again. All by investing in our own people.

Post a Comment

About Sustainable Democracy

Learn more about creating a Sustainable system of government and life for our nation. Bring back responsibility and fresh thinking in way most politicians would never consider, with radical change. More

Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe in a reader Or, subscribe via email:
Enter your email address:  
Find entries :